Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Red | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. These devices work with Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it is also a little heavier.
LG V60 ThinQ features a display that's very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a little bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better processor than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a worse 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with lot less MP and a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
LG V60 ThinQ's battery lifetime is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's battery performance.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.