Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 overall score. LG Velvet is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
LG Velvet features a screen that is very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3, although the LG Velvet also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a just a little better pixel amount in each inch of display and a little larger display. The LG Velvet features a superior memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and a same size camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot higher video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.