Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting a 91.2 score against 75.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the LG Wing has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. LG Wing is a newer cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG Wing, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Wing features a display that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3 one, although the LG Wing also has a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the display, a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG Wing has a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with faster video frame rate, a back camera with a much better resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
LG Wing counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory, the LG Wing also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3 has longer battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
LG Wing costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.