Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Red | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 has a score of 86.1, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3's general score of 75.6. These devices have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 20 is a notably newer phone, and it is also thinner and way lighter than nubia Red Magic 3.
Motorola Edge 20 features a display that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's display, and although the Motorola Edge 20 has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit greater display pixel density, they both have a same size screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit superior processor than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.