Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has an overall score of 78.5, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's construction is much newer, thinner and much lighter than nubia Red Magic 3. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, faster 30 fps video frame rates and a camera with a higher 50 MP resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.