Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black and Red | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with a overall score of 80.9 against 75.6. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a incredibly newer device, and it is also a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has an older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little greater count of pixels per inch of display. Nubia Red Magic 3 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with faster 30 frames per second video frame rate, a lot larger camera sensor and a lot higher resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and nubia Red Magic 3 feature very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.