Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Red | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a 77.2 score against 75.6. The Motorola Edge 40 body is a lot newer, much lighter and incredibly thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 has the older 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, because it has more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor, a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.