Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a overall score of 81.9 against 75.6. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a much newer device, and it's also noticeably lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a much smaller sensor and a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Neo and nubia Red Magic 3 count with similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has greater battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.