Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer phone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the previous 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit better display density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger memory for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has an 11% more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro and nubia Red Magic 3 feature really similar cameras, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a back camera with more mega-pixels, better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.