Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer device, and it is also thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit greater pixel density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture, a much bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality, a better resolution camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.