Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Red | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a score of 76.1 against 75.6. The Moto G Power construction has the same thickness than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's a little bit lighter. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G Power has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit bigger screen. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Moto G Power's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in nubia Red Magic 3. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a superior camera than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Moto G Power is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.