Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus (2021) has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. The Moto G Stylus (2021) is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit better display than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a quite worse pixel count in each inch of screen, a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a much higher video quality. The nubia Red Magic 3 has improved battery life than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.