Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-27 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 overall score. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Moto Z Force has the older 7.0 Nougat version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Moto Z Force's body is way lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels density.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture. Motorola Moto Z Force features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Moto Z Force is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.