Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a 77.4 score against 75.6. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition construction is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3, although it was released around a year before. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen pixels density. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83% larger battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations, a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs more money than nubia Red Magic 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as nubia Red Magic 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the nubia Red Magic 3, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.