Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Red | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play design is way thinner and extremely lighter than nubia Red Magic 3, even though it was released around a year before. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Moto Z2 Play has a greater memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots greater photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way more megapixels camera. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Moto Z2 Play is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.