Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting a score of 77.6 against 75.6. The Motorola Moto Z3 body is extremely thinner and a lot lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, although it was released only 9 months before. These phones include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Moto Z3 and nubia Red Magic 3 feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Moto Z3 has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Moto Z3 counts with a greater storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a lot higher video resolution, a camera in the back with way more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Motorola Moto Z3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.