Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Red | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. Motorola One 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a little faster CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3 and the Motorola One 5G have quite similar screens, and although the Motorola One 5G has a little higher pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px, they both have a screen of the same size. Motorola One 5G has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, the same diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. Motorola One 5G features a battery life that is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.