Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Red | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a 78.5 score against 75.6. Motorola One Action's body is a little thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, although both of them were only released 3 months apart. The Motorola One Action features a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a little bit greater screen pixel density.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Action has more memory for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 takes greater photos and videos than Motorola One Action, because it has a way higher resolution camera, a bigger aperture for better photography in low light situations and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Motorola One Action not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.