Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Motorola One Hyper and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released only a couple of months apart, the Motorola One Hyper is a little bit thinner and a little lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a bit larger screen. The Motorola One Hyper features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a little faster processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
The Motorola One Hyper is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.