Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Red | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. Even though the Motorola One Vision and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released with only a couple months difference, the Motorola One Vision is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Motorola One Vision has a little bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520px resolution.
Motorola One Vision features just a bit more storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, a same size aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot higher video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.