Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Red | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 overall score. Although Motorola One Zoom and nubia Red Magic 3 were only released 3 months apart, Motorola One Zoom is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a little bigger display.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same resolution camera in the back and a 0.5 inches sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot higher video resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with better battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola One Zoom is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.