Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with an 87 score against 75.6. The Motorola razr (2020) body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little greater pixels number per inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 and Motorola razr (2020) feature incredibly similar memory for apps and games, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, a same size diafragm aperture and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot higher video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the nubia Red Magic 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 3, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.