Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Red | Ocean |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. Both of these phones use Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and a little thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro and nubia Red Magic 3 feature very similar processors, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way bigger sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.