Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 385 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a overall score of 77 against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy A20s is a somewhat lighter and thinner phone than nubia Red Magic 3, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A20s has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a quite larger display, a higher display density and a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A20s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot higher video resolution, a lot larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has superior battery performance than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.