Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with a score of 76.1 against 75.6. The Galaxy A22 body is incredibly newer, lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A22 has an older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger diafragm aperture and a way higher video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.