Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Red | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting a general score of 84.6 against 75.6. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is incredibly newer, a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3.
Galaxy A22 5G features a display that's very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels amount in each inch of screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 and the Galaxy A22 5G both feature extremely similar batteries duration. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.