Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Red | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a general score of 79.9 against 75.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A25 5G is a a lot newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse 48 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3 and the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.