Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a 79.6 score against 75.6. Although the Galaxy A30 and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy A30 is incredibly lighter and much thinner. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a bit larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video quality and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A30, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.