Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Red | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30s is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a 79.8 score against 75.6. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A30s has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A30s's construction is extremely lighter and notably thinner than nubia Red Magic 3, although they were released only 4 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a better pixels density, a bit larger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A30s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.