Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Red | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a general score of 86.6 against 75.6. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Galaxy A50s and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released with only 5 months difference, the Galaxy A50s is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 and Galaxy A50s feature quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50s has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit better display density.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a 48 MP camera and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy A50s has a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.