Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having an 85.5 score against 75.6. The Galaxy A51 body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, although both of them were only released 7 months apart. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A51 has a screen that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's screen, because although the Galaxy A51 has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit bigger memory for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Nubia Red Magic 3 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a same size camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.