Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Red | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A51 5G is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G both have extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels back camera and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot better video quality and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
Galaxy A51 5G features a greater storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.