Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Red | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a score of 90.7 against 75.6. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Galaxy A52 counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in nubia Red Magic 3, because although the Galaxy A52 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit higher display pixels density.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP, faster video frame rates and a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.