Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. Galaxy A6's body is thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, even though it was released around 12 months before. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a larger display and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A6 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.