Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a score of 75.8 against 75.6. Galaxy A7 (2017)'s design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3, although it was released 2 years before. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher video resolution, a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 39 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.