Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A70 design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, although it has a bit inferior pixels count in each screen inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A70 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.