Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 body is lighter and incredibly thinner than nubia Red Magic 3, even though they were only released with a couple months difference. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch in the screen, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 has just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and faster 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.