Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-27 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C5 has a global score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C5 has older 6.0 Marshmallow version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Galaxy C5 is incredibly older than nubia Red Magic 3, it's construction is incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Nubia Red Magic 3 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a larger camera aperture and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.