Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Red | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with a general score of 88.1 against 75.6. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Samsung Galaxy F62 is a bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 3, it's just a bit thinner and also newer.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a little higher number of pixels per display inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy F62 takes a little bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and higher video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.