Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. The Galaxy Fold design is much thinner but incredibly heavier than nubia Red Magic 3, and both were released with only a couple months difference. These phones come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Fold's CPU is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3 one, both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
The Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.