Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Red | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a 78.9 score against 75.6. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy M20 has older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Galaxy M20 and nubia Red Magic 3 were released only 4 months apart, Galaxy M20 is lighter and just a bit thinner.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite lower screen density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a little larger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality, a much higher video resolution, a much more MP camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy M20 has a battery life that's very similar to nubia Red Magic 3's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.