Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a overall score of 82.4 against 75.6. Galaxy M30 is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3, although they were only released with a few months difference. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so both of them should provide you the same OS features.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite inferior pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality. The Galaxy M30 features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M30 and nubia Red Magic 3 both feature extremely similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.