Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3's overall score of 75.6. Galaxy M51's body is newer, a bit lighter and a little thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have a higher number of pixels per display inch, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a display with the same size.
Galaxy M51 has a little bit more storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a camera that is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a lot more megapixels camera in the back and higher video frame rates.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery performance than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.