Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. Galaxy Note 20's design is newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's CPU is just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a screen that's just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's screen, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little better pixel quantity per display inch, they both have a same size display. The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has lower 15 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.