Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 3's overall score of 75.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer, a bit lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 3. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a quite larger screen, more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bigger storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera with much more megapixels, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and better video frame rates.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.