Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's body is thinner and way lighter. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a much higher video resolution and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.