Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having an 89 score against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a somewhat thinner and much lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 3, even when they were released with only a few months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a display that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Galaxy Note10's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to nubia Red Magic 3's one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note10 is way more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.