Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Galaxy Note3's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, even though it was released 6 years before. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note3 has older 4.4.2 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a way larger diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.