Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Red | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even when Galaxy S10 and nubia Red Magic 3 were released only a few months apart, Galaxy S10 is lighter and somewhat thinner.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.