Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Red | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, although they were only released 0 months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 5G features as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the nubia Red Magic 3 one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.